<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HackTrack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hacktrack.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hacktrack.org</link>
	<description>Security Portal</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Trends in Counterfeit Currency</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/trends-in-counterfeit-currency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/trends-in-counterfeit-currency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>usb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AstalaVista]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Astalavista.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:astalavista.com://d03625f916e1dacd1f4359da5b8eed61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's getting worse:<br />
<br />
More counterfeiters are using today's ink-jet printers, computers and copiers to make money that's just good enough to pass, he said, even though their product is awful.<br />
<br />
In the past, he said, the best American counterfeiters were skilled printers who used heavy offset presses to turn out decent 20s, 50s and 100s. Now that kind of work is rare and almost all comes from abroad.<br />
<br />
Green pointed to a picture hanging in his downtown conference room. It's a photo from a 1980s Lenexa case that involved heavy printing presses and about 2 million fake dollars.<br />
<br />
&#34;That's what we used to see,&#34; he boomed. &#34;That's the kind of case we used to make.&#34;<br />
<br />
Agents discovered then that someone had purchased such equipment and a special kind of paper and it all went to the Lenexa shop. Then the agents secretly went in there with a court order and planted a tiny video camera on a Playboy calendar.<br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/trends_in_count.html"><br />
Article Source(Continued)</a><br />
<br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/trends-in-counterfeit-currency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Phishing Kits Hit the Market: Trojan HTML Injections Now for Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/new-phishing-kits-hit-the-market-trojan-html-injections-now-for-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/new-phishing-kits-hit-the-market-trojan-html-injections-now-for-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>usb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AstalaVista]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Astalavista.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:astalavista.com://5850c504e9c16c4a5d3507e779e57955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The economic lifecycle of the underground fraud community functions very similarly to the world of legitimate business. Online fraudsters have supply chains, third-party outsourcers, vendors, and online forums where people with skills and people with opportunities to commit fraud can find each other. The underground fraud supply chain is becoming more technically and operationally sophisticated, and we&#8217;ve coined this &#8220;Fraud-as-a-Service&#8221; or &#8220;FaaS&#8221;. FaaS consists of services for advanced hosting, Trojan infection kits and cashout services &#8211; all for sale within the fraudster underground.<br />
<br />
Some fraudsters have developed websites to sell ready-made products to other fraudsters, such as phishing kits. Recently, the RSA FraudAction Research Lab traced a new type of service on a particular website to sell HTML injections, which can be combined with Trojan attacks. We will refer to this website as a Web Injection Shop.<br />
<br />
HTML injections are not a new approach to stealing credentials and other personal information. However, the production-scale central repository for HTML injections in the Web Injection Shop is a new discovery, and is easily accessible by fraudsters. The Web Injection Shop that was traced is very similar to other websites that sell phishing kits and offers a long list of HTML injection codes designed to steal information from customers of dozens of financial institutions worldwide. Similar to phishing kits, each HTML injection is specifically tailored to match each bank&#8217;s specific website design.<br />
<br />
The Web Injection Shop offers HTML snippets, as well as entire web pages, designed to fool online banking users into divulging their credentials and other personal information. Prices vary by target and HTML injection type &#8211; ranging between USD$10-30 &#8211; and fraudsters can browse through screenshots of various HTML injections that are for sale. <br />
<a href="http://www.rsa.com/blog/blog_entry.aspx?id=1410"><br />
Article Source(Continued)</a><br />
<br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/new-phishing-kits-hit-the-market-trojan-html-injections-now-for-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flashy Botnet is Flashy</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/flashy-botnet-is-flashy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/flashy-botnet-is-flashy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>usb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AstalaVista]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Astalavista.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:astalavista.com://427b5cf3441ede1d77de997d61623684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago fellows from F-Secure collected a bunch of neat log data on botnet IRC channel joins. They then asked us to visualize the joins on a world map, much akin to what we did with the Kaminsky DNS patching logs. We gleefully agreed.<br />
<br />
So, this is the result: <br />
<a href="https://www.clarifiednetworks.com/Blog/2009-01-01%2018-15"><br />
Article Source(Continued)</a><br />
<br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/flashy-botnet-is-flashy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTTP Verb Brute Forcing</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/http-verb-brute-forcing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/http-verb-brute-forcing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>usb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AstalaVista]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Astalavista.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:astalavista.com://b0b440bc4daaabd1571bbed8b608676d</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a few interesting posts here and here regarding brute forcing HTTP verbs. The F5 post suggested that it is possible to thwart people who are looking for what options you support by giving a fake response. That&#8217;s certainly one way to do it, but it&#8217;s not as robust as it might appear.<br />
<br />
By actually testing each verb by hand, it&#8217;s pretty easy to skip using options, if that&#8217;s not available to you. Or, if you are on the defensive side, if you are turning off one verb, turn off everything that you don&#8217;t use, so you don&#8217;t have to worry about it. Iterating verbs can be super useful for finding open/unprotected Webdav servers, finding open directories that allow PUT, or open proxies. In general automated worms just try to perform the exploit rather than iterate options anyway, so in general it&#8217;s probably a good idea to shut down all HTTP verbs and open them up as you need them, rather than close them down one at a time as you figure out why they could be used for nefarious purposes.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20090105/http-verb-brute-forcing/">Article Source(Continued)</a><br />
<br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/http-verb-brute-forcing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox add-on SSL Certificate Patrol</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/firefox-add-on-ssl-certificate-patrol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/firefox-add-on-ssl-certificate-patrol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>usb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AstalaVista]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Astalavista.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:astalavista.com://e1adecb721102a07d233032d5518c873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img height="143" width="533" src="/images/content/ssl.gif" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
Your web browser trusts a lot of certification authorities and chained sub-authorities, and it does so blindly. &#34;Subordinate certification authorities&#34; are a little known device: The root CAs in your browser can delegate permission to issue certificates to an unlimited amount of subordinate CAs (SCA) just by signing their certificate, not by borrowing their precious private key to them. Even Wikipedia doesn't mention this, nor do any public transparent listings exist of all the sub-CAs that your browser trusts every day. It might be virtually impossible to tell how many CAs you are trusting de-facto.<br />
<br />
Revealing this and other inner workings of X.509 to end users is deemed as being too difficult for them to handle. You however are an advanced user, who wants to keep track on when certificates are updated and make sure none of the many authorities you involuntarily need to trust to have a working web browsing experience, abuses your trust allowing someone to read into your HTTPS communications by means of a subtle man in the middle attack. Still, this is a very paranoid thing to expect to happen, so only use this if you think you are sufficiently paranoid. <br />
<br />
<strong>Download:</strong><br />
<br />
<a href="http://uploaded.to/?id=0t3evv">http://uploaded.to/?id=0t3evv</a><br />
<a href="http://w19.easy-share.com/1903158199.html">http://w19.easy-share.com/1903158199.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QYPSANRN">http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QYPSANRN</a><br />
<a href="http://www7.zippyshare.com/v/53116482/file.html">http://www7.zippyshare.com/v/53116482/file.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.zshare.net/download/5378549931c81560/">http://www.zshare.net/download/5378549931c81560/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.filefactory.com/file/a010h30/n/certificate_patrol-0_4_0_5-fx_zip">http://www.filefactory.com/file/a010h30/n/certificate_patrol-0_4_0_5-fx_zip</a><br />
<a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/180577963/certificate_patrol-0.4.0.5-fx.zip.html">http://rapidshare.com/files/180577963/certificate_patrol-0.4.0.5-fx.zip.html</a><br />
<br />
<strong>---------------------------------------------------------------<br />
MD5:</strong> 0ab3e352ec07ca73caf39a9a9f6f939b<br />
<strong>---------------------------------------------------------------</strong><br />
<a href="http://patrol.psyced.org/"><br />
Article Source(Continued)</a><br />
<br />
<strong>---------------------------------------------------------------</strong>----------------------------
<ul>
    <li><strong>Mozilla url:</strong> <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6415">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6415</a></li>
    <li><strong>Works with:</strong> Firefox: 2.0a1 &#8211; 3.0b3</li>
    <li><strong>Download:</strong> <a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0.0.20/">Firefox 2.0.0.20</a></li>
</ul>
<strong>---------------------------------------------------------------</strong>----------------------------<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patrol.psyced.org/"><br />
</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/firefox-add-on-ssl-certificate-patrol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rare peek at Homeland Security&#8217;s files on travelers</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/a-rare-peek-at-homeland-securitys-files-on-travelers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/a-rare-peek-at-homeland-securitys-files-on-travelers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hack In The Box</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.hackinthebox.org://27070fdb9e0c4b2c3404ab3619d21ca6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The oversize white envelope bore the blue logo of the Department of Homeland Security. Inside, I found 20 photocopies of the government's records on my international travels. Every overseas trip I've taken since 2001 was noted.

I had requested the files after I had heard that the government tracks "passenger activity." Starting in the mid-1990s, many airlines handed over passenger records. Since 2002, the government has mandated that the commercial airlines deliver this information routinely and electronically.

A passenger record typically includes the name of the person traveling, the name of the person who submitted the information while arranging the trip, and details about how the ticket was bought, according to documents published by the Department of Homeland Security. Records are made for citizens and non-citizens who cross our borders. An agent from U.S. Customs and Border Protection can generate a travel history for any traveler with a few keystrokes on a computer. Officials use the information to prevent terrorism, acts of organized crime, and other illegal activity.

I had been curious about what's in my travel dossier, so I made a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for a copy. I'm posting here a few sample pages of what officials sent me. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/a-rare-peek-at-homeland-securitys-files-on-travelers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake celeb LinkedIn profiles lead to malware</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/fake-celeb-linkedin-profiles-lead-to-malware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/fake-celeb-linkedin-profiles-lead-to-malware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hack In The Box</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.hackinthebox.org://37bba20d12157f26a78ea9a98ca789fc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A security researcher has discovered fake profiles for celebrities on LinkedIn that have links to malicious code, according to a blog posting on Trend Micro's site.

The celebrity profiles that are not to be trusted include ones created using the names: Beyonce Knowles, Victoria Beckham, Christina Ricci, Kirsten Dunst, Salma Hayek, and Kate Hudson. They were uncovered by Trend Micro Advanced Threats Researcher Ivan Macalintal.

In its blog posting late on Monday, Trend Micro said it was continuing its investigation. The links on the professional networking site attempt to lure viewers by purporting to be nude shots of the celebrities. McAfee's Avert Labs Blog has more details and screenshots. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/fake-celeb-linkedin-profiles-lead-to-malware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype 2.8 Beta for Mac Released</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/skype-28-beta-for-mac-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/skype-28-beta-for-mac-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hack In The Box</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.hackinthebox.org://f36f0cd69567d2b908b7f78feced5f7b</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in time for Macworld, those ridiculously talented Estonian engineers have come out with the latest version of everyone's favorite Internet phone and video calling software the Skype 2.8 beta.

Among other extras, this new version includes two all-new features: The first lets you use your Skype credit to pay for Boingo Wi-Fi hotspots on a minute-by-minute basis. So, forget having to fork over $10 just to send a quick message off to your loved one or business partner. Now you can do it for actual small change--just US$0.19/minute.

You can also now do screen sharing with other Skype users. Of course, iChat has had this feature for awhile now, but iChat can't do cross-platform screen sharing so you can help out your Windows/Linux friends. There are some limitations at the moment, though: for example, while you can share your screen with your buddies on Windows and Linux, you can't yet see their screens. But really: who wants to look at a Windows or Linux screen when you've got your Mac in front of you?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/skype-28-beta-for-mac-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Five Most Dangerous Security Myths</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/the-five-most-dangerous-security-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/the-five-most-dangerous-security-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hack In The Box</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.hackinthebox.org://ea28cefa12bc88ca1691100452be8a73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still think that today's computer viruses and other malware come from some maladjusted teen out to vandalize your PC to make a name for himself? Think again. The persistent myth is a holdover from days long gone, and it's important to dispel it if you want to know what you're up against - and how to protect yourself.

The splashy worms and malicious viruses that clogged entire networks and indiscriminately wiped hard drives are essentially gone. Today, it's all about cash - and lots of it. If there's a way to use evil software to make money, whether it means taking over a PC to send pharmacy-advertising spam, or stealing financial logins and credit card info, or even hacking game accounts, it's out there in some form.

There's even a thriving online black market that sells everything from software kits to roll-your-own malware to spam services using infected PCs to reams and reams of credit card data stolen by keylogger malware. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/the-five-most-dangerous-security-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple to sell iTunes songs DRM free</title>
		<link>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/apple-to-sell-itunes-songs-drm-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/apple-to-sell-itunes-songs-drm-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hack In The Box</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HackInTheBox.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.hackinthebox.org://8d53180624f8bc2fc64bf43c7eba5a29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple on Tuesday said every song in its iTunes library will be available without anti-piracy software by April.

The announcement came at a Macworld Expo keynote presentation at which Apple marketing vice president Phil Schiller unveiled a new top-end MacBook Pro laptop computer model and snazzy upgrades to Macintosh computer software.

"We worked with all major music companies and, starting today, iTunes will offer eight million songs DRM free and by the end of this quarter all 10 million will be DRM free," Schiller said. "All songs will be DRM free in iTunes at iTunes Plus." Recording studios have long insisted on digital rights management (DRM) software that prevents music from being copied.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hacktrack.org/2009/01/07/apple-to-sell-itunes-songs-drm-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
